Deal Terms & Mechanics: The Fine Print That Determines Your Net Proceeds

52 terms · Full definitions, seller & buyer perspectives, and real-world examples

Two deals at the same headline enterprise value can produce very different amounts of cash in your pocket at closing — and very different risk profiles for the years that follow. The difference lies in deal terms: working capital adjustments, escrow requirements, earnout structures, and indemnification caps.

This category deconstructs the mechanics of M&A transactions: the working capital peg, escrow and holdback structures, earnout design, and the indemnification framework that governs your post-close liability.

The core principle: most of these terms have market standards, but market standards have ranges. A seller who understands the range negotiates from knowledge rather than deference.

52 total terms52 full entries0 concise entries← All categories

E

Earn-out Metric

Full

The specific financial metric used to determine earnout achievement and payment. Common choices: (1) **EBITDA** — measures overall profitability; most common in SMB deals; subject to accounting manipulation risks; (2) **Revenue** — simpler to measure; less subject to manipulation; better when growth is the primary earnout thesis; (3) **Gross profit** — balances growth and margin quality; less manipulable than EBITDA; (4) **Specific KPIs** — customer retention, contract renewals, new customer count. Metric selection matters: EBITDA gives buyers more control (expenses affect EBITDA); revenue gives sellers more certainty.

Earnout

Full

A portion of purchase price paid to the seller after closing, contingent on the business achieving specific performance targets — used to bridge valuation gaps and share post-close risk.

Earnout Dispute

Full

Disagreements between buyer and seller over whether earnout performance targets were achieved and whether payment is owed. One of the most common and contentious post-close M&A conflicts. Sources: ambiguous target definitions, accounting methodology disagreements, buyer operational decisions that damaged performance, or seller claims of manipulation. Prevention: highly specific earnout definitions, clear accounting methodology, anti-manipulation protections (buyer can't reduce earnout by starving the business of resources), and defined dispute resolution procedures (independent auditor arbitration).

Equity Rollover

Full

When the seller reinvests a portion of their sale proceeds into equity of the buyer (or the acquisition vehicle), maintaining ownership in the combined business post-close.

Escrow

Full

A portion of purchase price held by a neutral third party after closing to secure the seller's indemnification obligations — a buyer's cushion against post-close claims.

N

Net Debt

Full

Total interest-bearing debt minus cash and cash equivalents — calculated at closing in cash-free, debt-free deals to determine how much of the enterprise value flows to the seller after debt is paid off.

Net Working Capital

Full

The capital tied up in a business's operating cycle — typically defined as current assets (AR, inventory) minus current liabilities (AP, accrued expenses), excluding cash and debt — and one of the most negotiated purchase price adjustments.

No-shop Provision

Full

A contractual restriction preventing the seller from soliciting, entertaining, or negotiating with other potential buyers — typically the binding exclusivity provision in a signed LOI. No-shop clauses run for the exclusivity period (30-90 days typically) and are the standard mechanism for buyers to secure a period of deal certainty for due diligence investment. Contrasts with a [Go-shop Provision](#go-shop-provision), which allows post-signing solicitation.

Non-solicitation Agreement

Full

A narrower restriction than a non-compete — specifically prohibiting the seller from actively soliciting the sold business's customers or employees for a defined period, even if a full non-compete isn't included or isn't enforceable. Non-solicitation agreements are more broadly enforceable than non-competes in states like California, where non-competes are largely banned but non-solicits are permitted in some circumstances. Standard M&A transactions include both a non-compete and a non-solicit covering customers and employees.

W

Warranty Claim

Full

Warranty Claim is a deal mechanics term governing the financial and legal specifics of how purchase consideration is structured or adjusted in M&A.

Warranty Escrow

Full

A portion of the purchase price held in escrow post-closing specifically to secure the seller's indemnification obligations for rep and warranty breaches. Typically 10% of deal value for 12-18 months — the primary security for buyer's indemnification claims. See full treatment at [Escrow](#escrow). In R&W insurance deals, the warranty escrow typically shrinks to 0.5-1% (matching the policy retention), as the insurer covers most claims above the retention.

Working Capital Adjustment

Full

A purchase price adjustment comparing the business's working capital at closing to an agreed target (the "peg") — with any shortfall deducted from seller proceeds and any surplus added.

Working Capital Collar

Full

A defined range around the working capital peg within which no purchase price adjustment is made — protecting both parties from minor fluctuations in closing-date working capital. If the collar is $150K and closing WC is within $150K of the peg (above or below), no adjustment occurs. Adjustments are made only for variances outside the collar range. Collars of $100-250K are typical for LMM deals and reduce post-close disputes over small amounts.

Working Capital Peg

Full

The agreed target level of working capital the seller is expected to deliver at closing — the benchmark against which actual closing working capital is measured for purchase price adjustment.